Феноменологія та типологія необережних злочинів, вчинених кількома суб’єктами
Loading...
Date
2019
Authors
Багіров, Сергій
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
У статті на підставі висвітлення проблем кримінально-правової оцінки необережних злочинів, вчинених кількома особами, доведено важливість феноменологічних досліджень для розвитку ессенціальних наукових теорій. У пропонованій публікації шляхом опису та аналізу новітнього емпіричного матеріалу доповнено феноменологію необережних злочинів, у вчиненні яких брали участь кілька суб’єктів. Авторський внесок у феноменологію цих злочинів дасть змогу розширити наукові уявлення про явище багатосуб’єктних необережних злочинів, а наведені практичні приклади можуть бути використані в навчальній та науковій кримінально-правовій літературі. Автор також уточнив і доповнив типологічну характеристику відповідних злочинів. Запропоновано перелік істотних ознак для кожної типологічної групи. З’ясовано, що під час поділу необережного співзаподіяння на "паралельне" та "послідовне" треба мати на увазі, що остання типологічна група є неоднорідною і має щонайменше два підтипи, які відрізняються низкою ознак.
The article, on the basis of the coverage of the criminal-law problem of careless crimes committed by several offenders, analyzes the importance of phenomenological research for the development of the essential scientific theories. The proposed publication supplements, by the description and analysis of the latest empirical material, the phenomenology of careless crimes, committed by several subjects. The author’s contribution to the phenomenology of these crimes extends scientific ideas about the phenomenon of multi-offender careless crimes. The given practical examples can be used in educational and scientific criminal-law literature. The author specifies and completes the typological description of the relevant crimes. A list of essential features for each typological group is offered. The signs of the first typological group are as follow: 1. Violations of safety rules are identical. 2. There is a single criminal consequence for these people that is indivisible, common. 3. Identity of the act and the unity of consequence allows us to conclude that the causal meaning of each of the subjects is equivalent in the causal sense. 4. Violation of safety rules by each subject occurs in one place and time or in one situation. 5. There is a subjective consistency 6. Offense is covered by the features of one rule of criminal law of the Special Part of the Criminal Code. The signs of the second typological group: 1. Violations of safety rules are not identical. 2. This feature coincides with the typological feature of the first group of cases – the criminal consequence is indivisible, common to all offenders. 3. The non-identity of the act (violations of the rules of safety) allows us to conclude that the causal inequality of violations of safety rules is at the same time the act of each subject constitutes the necessary condition (conditio sine qua non) of a consequence whose generation occurs only through the interaction of the violations. 4. Violations of the rules of safety by each subject, although they may occur in one place and time (or in one situation), however, more often, the violations do not coincide at the place and time. 5. There is no subjective consistency. 6. The offense committed in some cases is covered by the features of one rule of criminal law of the Special Part of the Criminal Code, but there is also a separate qualification of violations of the rules of safety of each subject on the basis of various rules of criminal law. It has been found out that in the division of careless co-causality into “parallel” and “consecutive” it is necessary to keep in mind the heterogeneity of the latter typological group: it includes at least two subtypesthat differ in a number of features.
The article, on the basis of the coverage of the criminal-law problem of careless crimes committed by several offenders, analyzes the importance of phenomenological research for the development of the essential scientific theories. The proposed publication supplements, by the description and analysis of the latest empirical material, the phenomenology of careless crimes, committed by several subjects. The author’s contribution to the phenomenology of these crimes extends scientific ideas about the phenomenon of multi-offender careless crimes. The given practical examples can be used in educational and scientific criminal-law literature. The author specifies and completes the typological description of the relevant crimes. A list of essential features for each typological group is offered. The signs of the first typological group are as follow: 1. Violations of safety rules are identical. 2. There is a single criminal consequence for these people that is indivisible, common. 3. Identity of the act and the unity of consequence allows us to conclude that the causal meaning of each of the subjects is equivalent in the causal sense. 4. Violation of safety rules by each subject occurs in one place and time or in one situation. 5. There is a subjective consistency 6. Offense is covered by the features of one rule of criminal law of the Special Part of the Criminal Code. The signs of the second typological group: 1. Violations of safety rules are not identical. 2. This feature coincides with the typological feature of the first group of cases – the criminal consequence is indivisible, common to all offenders. 3. The non-identity of the act (violations of the rules of safety) allows us to conclude that the causal inequality of violations of safety rules is at the same time the act of each subject constitutes the necessary condition (conditio sine qua non) of a consequence whose generation occurs only through the interaction of the violations. 4. Violations of the rules of safety by each subject, although they may occur in one place and time (or in one situation), however, more often, the violations do not coincide at the place and time. 5. There is no subjective consistency. 6. The offense committed in some cases is covered by the features of one rule of criminal law of the Special Part of the Criminal Code, but there is also a separate qualification of violations of the rules of safety of each subject on the basis of various rules of criminal law. It has been found out that in the division of careless co-causality into “parallel” and “consecutive” it is necessary to keep in mind the heterogeneity of the latter typological group: it includes at least two subtypesthat differ in a number of features.
Description
Keywords
феноменологія, теорія, ессенціальна теорія, необережність, багатосуб’єктний необережний злочин, необережне співзаподіяння, типологія, типологічна група, стаття, phenomenology, theory, essential theory, carelessness, multi-offender careless crime, careless co-causality, typology, typology group
Citation
Багіров С. Р. Феноменологія та типологія необережних злочинів, вчинених кількома суб’єктами / Багіров С. Р. // Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки. - 2019. - Т. 3. - С. 26-34.