Зміни до Конституції України в частині конституційної юрисдикції: особливості перехідних відносин
Loading...
Date
2017
Authors
Шуліма, Альона
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
У статті проаналізовано основні проблеми перехідних відносин, які виникли внаслідок внесення
змін до Конституції України в частині конституційної юрисдикції, розглянуто можливі способи запобігання цим проблемам, а також запропоновано інструменти їх вирішення.
Автор статті звертає увагу на необхідність системного аналізу перехідних відносин при розробленні змін до Основного Закону України (як і законодавства в цілому) та їх урегулювання за допомогою спеціальних темпоральних норм. Виокремлено два основні завдання, вирішенню яких
мали б сприяти перехідні положення: належне запровадження нової моделі правового регулювання та поступовий перехід до такої моделі суб’єктів, які вже перебувають у відповідних правовідносинах.
The article addresses the main problems of transitional relationships of constitutional jurisdiction caused by the latest constitutional amendments. The author emphasizes the importance of transitional regulations, especially in the states being in the process of permanent reforms. The given temporal analysis of the constitutional amendments concerning constitutional jurisdiction detects a number of issues of improper transitional regulation. The first set of uncertainties concerns the absence of mechanism of completion of some cases which had been in the Constitutional Court before the constitutional amendments came into force, particularly on official law interpretation. The second set of questions concerns the failure of gradual transition to a new model of regulation, particularly of the constitutional complaint. The author finds unacceptable the position of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine not to consider the constitutional complaints before appropriate amendments to the laws are approved. Summarizing the analysis provided in the article, it is concluded that a systematic approach to the analysis of transitional relationships have not been reflected in the constitutional amendments. Suspension of the people’s constitutional right of access to the constitutional jurisdiction is one of the consequences of this situation. The author asserts that while developing the transitional provisions of law (including constitutional amendments), two major problems should be solved: the proper implementation of the new institutions and procuring for persons who are already subjects of legal relations, for the smooth transition to a new regulation model. Since this is not taken into account in practice, the author deems it necessary to develop further theoretical and practical knowledge of temporal regulations, including the tools of entry of the law into force.
The article addresses the main problems of transitional relationships of constitutional jurisdiction caused by the latest constitutional amendments. The author emphasizes the importance of transitional regulations, especially in the states being in the process of permanent reforms. The given temporal analysis of the constitutional amendments concerning constitutional jurisdiction detects a number of issues of improper transitional regulation. The first set of uncertainties concerns the absence of mechanism of completion of some cases which had been in the Constitutional Court before the constitutional amendments came into force, particularly on official law interpretation. The second set of questions concerns the failure of gradual transition to a new model of regulation, particularly of the constitutional complaint. The author finds unacceptable the position of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine not to consider the constitutional complaints before appropriate amendments to the laws are approved. Summarizing the analysis provided in the article, it is concluded that a systematic approach to the analysis of transitional relationships have not been reflected in the constitutional amendments. Suspension of the people’s constitutional right of access to the constitutional jurisdiction is one of the consequences of this situation. The author asserts that while developing the transitional provisions of law (including constitutional amendments), two major problems should be solved: the proper implementation of the new institutions and procuring for persons who are already subjects of legal relations, for the smooth transition to a new regulation model. Since this is not taken into account in practice, the author deems it necessary to develop further theoretical and practical knowledge of temporal regulations, including the tools of entry of the law into force.
Description
Keywords
перехідні відносини, зміни до Конституції України, конституційна скарга, офіційне тлумачення, темпоральні норми, чинність закону, дія закону, переживаюча (ультраактивна) дія закону, transitional relationships, changes to the Constitution of Ukraine, the constitutional complaint, the official interpretation, temporal regulations, coming into force (of the law), ultraactive force of the law, стаття
Citation
Шуліма А. О. Зміни до Конституції України в частині конституційної юрисдикції: особливості перехідних відносин / Шуліма А. О. // Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки. - 2017. - Т. 193. - С. 22-26.