Врегулювання спору за участю судді: чи є ефективною ця процедура?
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Ханик-Посполітак, Роксолана
Нурищенко, Роман
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Статтю присвячено вивченню ефективності застосування інституту врегулювання спору за участю судді через аналіз судової практики в усіх видах судочинства в судах першої інстанції, окрім кримінального. Зазначено, що з 2017 р. в судовій практиці з’явився абсолютно новий процесуальний інститут врегулювання спору за участю судді. Його запровадження в українське процесуальне законодавство мало на меті розвантажити судову систему. Однак, чи виконав цей інститут основне завдання, можливо з’ясувати через аналіз судової практики. У статті здійснено аналіз судової практики за весь час існування цього інституту в цивільному, адміністративному та господарському судочинстві з метою визначення частоти його застосування на практиці. З’ясовано, що врегулювання спору за участю судді в адміністративному судочинстві фактично не застосовується. Далі на підставі аналізу 100 справ за останній період визначено категорії справ, де врегулювання спору за участю судді застосовувалося частіше. Зроблено висновок, що на сьогодні інститут врегулювання спору за участю судді не набув широкого застосування та поки що його ефективність є незначною.
The article studies the effectiveness of the institution of dispute resolution with the participation of a judge through the analysis of legislation and judicial practice in all types of proceedings in the courts of first instance, except criminal. It is noted that since 2017, a completely new procedural institute for the settlement of disputes with the participation of a judge has appeared in procedural codes of Ukraine, except criminal, and in judicial practice thereafter. Its introduction into Ukrainian procedural law was with the intention to relieve the judicial system. However, to find out whether this institute has fulfilled the assigned intention, the analysis of judicial practice is required. Accordingly, the analysis of judicial practice has been conducted, comprising all years of existence of this institution in civil, administrative, and commercial litigation in order to determine the frequency and success rates of its application in practice. This revealed that dispute settlement with the participation of a judge in administrative proceedings barely applies. In addition, based on the analysis of one hundred cases for the last period, there are certain categories of cases where dispute settlement with the participation of a judge was used more often. Eventually, it was concluded that today the institute of dispute settlement with the participation of a judge has not been widely used and its effectiveness remains insignificant. Therefore, the institution of dispute resolution with the participation of a judge requires a great reformation – consisting of enforcement of mediation execution by judges, specific ways of resolution of cases belonging to certain categories as well as insertion of corresponding provisions in procedural codes, and popularization to the masses.
The article studies the effectiveness of the institution of dispute resolution with the participation of a judge through the analysis of legislation and judicial practice in all types of proceedings in the courts of first instance, except criminal. It is noted that since 2017, a completely new procedural institute for the settlement of disputes with the participation of a judge has appeared in procedural codes of Ukraine, except criminal, and in judicial practice thereafter. Its introduction into Ukrainian procedural law was with the intention to relieve the judicial system. However, to find out whether this institute has fulfilled the assigned intention, the analysis of judicial practice is required. Accordingly, the analysis of judicial practice has been conducted, comprising all years of existence of this institution in civil, administrative, and commercial litigation in order to determine the frequency and success rates of its application in practice. This revealed that dispute settlement with the participation of a judge in administrative proceedings barely applies. In addition, based on the analysis of one hundred cases for the last period, there are certain categories of cases where dispute settlement with the participation of a judge was used more often. Eventually, it was concluded that today the institute of dispute settlement with the participation of a judge has not been widely used and its effectiveness remains insignificant. Therefore, the institution of dispute resolution with the participation of a judge requires a great reformation – consisting of enforcement of mediation execution by judges, specific ways of resolution of cases belonging to certain categories as well as insertion of corresponding provisions in procedural codes, and popularization to the masses.
Description
Keywords
інститут врегулювання спору за участю судді, позовне провадження, цивільне судочинство, адміністративне судочинство, господарське судочинство, стаття, institution, dispute settlement with the participation of a judge, claim proceedings, civil proceedings, administrative proceedings, commercial proceedings
Citation
Ханик-Посполітак Р. Ю. Врегулювання спору за участю судді: чи є ефективною ця процедура? / Ханик-Посполітак Р. Ю., Нурищенко Р. С. // Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки. - 2021. - Т. 8. - С. 85-91. - https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2021.8.85-91