Класифікаційні параметри невласне граматичного узгодження
Loading...
Date
2018
Authors
Арібжанова, Ірина
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
У статті розглянуто типологічні ознаки невласне граматичного узгодження, що має вияв
у структурах зі специфічно вираженим опорним компонентом у функції означуваного предмета
(незмінний субстантив, змінний субстантив недиференційованого роду, сполука слів, речення).
Схарактеризовано фактори вибору форми залежного атрибутивного компонента (дієслова та
прикметника). Систематизовано регулярні випадки реалізації асоціативно-граматичного,
смислового та умовно-граматичного підтипів узгодження в українській мові.
Background. In the studies of Ukrainian linguists of the first half of the twentieth century (S. SmalStotskyi, F. Gartner, V. Simovych, S. Smerechynskyi, O. Syniavskyi), there were recorded special cases of agreement that differ from a typical agreement. The opposition of two types of agreement is actualized in modern grammar in terms of proper grammatical agreement and improper grammatical agreement. The latter is of scientific interest from the perspective of the mechanisms by which the structure’s components are bound together (determinative one with the function of a designated object + dependent one with the function of the attribute of an object), as well as the expression of a determinative component, the motives of the choice of dependent word, and the classification parameterization. Purpose. The aim is to consider typological signs of an improper grammatical agreement, to characterize the factors for choice of the form of a dependent attributive component (verb and adjective), and to systematize the regular cases of the implementation of associative-grammatical, semantic and conditionallygrammatical subtypes of agreement in the Ukrainian language. Methods. A set of methods is used: descriptive, structural, and functional ones. Results. A differential sign of an improper grammatical agreement is the absence of formally-grammatical indicator of connection in the determinative word: таксі приїхало (unlike proper grammatical agreement, where the indicator is the forms of two combining components: машина приїхала). A determinative component can be expressed by substantives without flexions, substantives of undifferentiated gender (without indicators of the gender category), conjunctions of words, and sentences. The categorical form of a dependent component (finite verb or adjective word) is “predicted” by the structural and semantic specificity of a determinative component. Discussion. An associative-grammatical agreement, in fact, is a mediated grammatical agreement (the forms of a dependent component duplicate the forms of the word with which a determinative component is associated); the assimilation takes place following the example of grammatical agreement: сильний вітрище because of сильний вітерØ. Semantic agreement characterizes the structures in which the form of a dependent word reflects real signs of a subject expressed by a determinative word – sex of an individual (noun-creature), singularity or plurality of objects (countable noun); connection is realized in the categories of number and gender (masculine or feminine): секретар доповіла, більшість студентів + прийшли. A conditionallygrammatical agreement is a connection with determinative components which point to an object that is not defined in the formal or semantic sense: щире спасибі, злий собака; forms of masculine / neuter gender (or 3-rd person) of dependent words polarize the meaning of animate / inanimate being: ніхто не забутий, ніщо не забуте.
Background. In the studies of Ukrainian linguists of the first half of the twentieth century (S. SmalStotskyi, F. Gartner, V. Simovych, S. Smerechynskyi, O. Syniavskyi), there were recorded special cases of agreement that differ from a typical agreement. The opposition of two types of agreement is actualized in modern grammar in terms of proper grammatical agreement and improper grammatical agreement. The latter is of scientific interest from the perspective of the mechanisms by which the structure’s components are bound together (determinative one with the function of a designated object + dependent one with the function of the attribute of an object), as well as the expression of a determinative component, the motives of the choice of dependent word, and the classification parameterization. Purpose. The aim is to consider typological signs of an improper grammatical agreement, to characterize the factors for choice of the form of a dependent attributive component (verb and adjective), and to systematize the regular cases of the implementation of associative-grammatical, semantic and conditionallygrammatical subtypes of agreement in the Ukrainian language. Methods. A set of methods is used: descriptive, structural, and functional ones. Results. A differential sign of an improper grammatical agreement is the absence of formally-grammatical indicator of connection in the determinative word: таксі приїхало (unlike proper grammatical agreement, where the indicator is the forms of two combining components: машина приїхала). A determinative component can be expressed by substantives without flexions, substantives of undifferentiated gender (without indicators of the gender category), conjunctions of words, and sentences. The categorical form of a dependent component (finite verb or adjective word) is “predicted” by the structural and semantic specificity of a determinative component. Discussion. An associative-grammatical agreement, in fact, is a mediated grammatical agreement (the forms of a dependent component duplicate the forms of the word with which a determinative component is associated); the assimilation takes place following the example of grammatical agreement: сильний вітрище because of сильний вітерØ. Semantic agreement characterizes the structures in which the form of a dependent word reflects real signs of a subject expressed by a determinative word – sex of an individual (noun-creature), singularity or plurality of objects (countable noun); connection is realized in the categories of number and gender (masculine or feminine): секретар доповіла, більшість студентів + прийшли. A conditionallygrammatical agreement is a connection with determinative components which point to an object that is not defined in the formal or semantic sense: щире спасибі, злий собака; forms of masculine / neuter gender (or 3-rd person) of dependent words polarize the meaning of animate / inanimate being: ніхто не забутий, ніщо не забуте.
Description
Keywords
власне граматичне узгодження, невласне граматичне узгодження, смислове узгодження, умовно-граматичне узгодження, асоціативно-граматичне узгодження, стаття, proper grammatical agreement, improper grammatical agreement, associative-grammatical agreement, semantic agreement, conditionally-grammatical agreement
Citation
Арібжанова І. М. Класифікаційні параметри невласне граматичного узгодження / Ірина Арібжанова // Наукові записки НаУКМА. Мовознавство. - 2018. - Т. 1. - С. 27-34.