The objective of the article was to analyze the problematic
aspects of the judicial executive process, considering its properties
and the classification of its stages. The methodological basis of the
study are the general and special methods of scientific knowledge
(inductive, analytical, hermeneutic, systemic and others). The results of the
study include the analysis of scientific approaches to the essence, properties,
classification of stages of the executive process and argumentation of
theoretical proposals and informed practices. Moreover, the authors’
conclusions on certain topics are set out, a new original definition of "stages
of the executive process" and their original new classification is based. The
practical importance of the results is that the conclusions and proposals
made significantly enrich procedural science during the implementation
of judicial decisions; it will be useful for the subjects of enforcement
proceedings (implementing agents, parties to enforcement proceedings)
in the exercise of their procedural rights and the performance of their
procedural functions. The conclusions presented based on the analysis can
be used to generalize executive practice.