Активні та пасивні конструкції в мовній практиці студентів-філологів закладів вищої освіти України

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorЛаврінець, Олена uk_UA
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T13:10:17Z
dc.date.available2024-11-26T13:10:17Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionTraditionally, the paradigm of passive constructions includes sentences with passive verbs ending in -ся, predicative participles ending in -ний and -тий, and forms ending in -но and -тo. The central place in the passive paradigm of East Slavic languages, including Ukrainian, is occupied by sentences with verbs ending in -ся. According to the newest approach, the passive paradigm has been adjusted: sentences with passive verbs ending in -ся have found themselves on the extreme periphery of the syntactic system of the Ukrainian literary language, and they are recognized as not characteristic of it. The active/passive opposition can be formed only by transitive verbs, the passive correlates of which are predicative passive participles and forms ending in -но and -mo. The language practice of the younger generation of philologists, in particular students, whose thorough professional training should include familiarization with the traditional and newest approaches to the scope of the passive paradigm, requires special study. The survey shows that active constructions (two-part and one-part indefinite-personal sentences) dominate in the choice of philology students, and almost half of the respondents consciously prefer them, which demonstrates their awareness of the current trend of returning active constructions to the book syntax of the Ukrainian language. According to the survey results, the paradigm of passive constructions is three-component and has the following hierarchy: the core is formed by sentences with predicative participles ending in -ний and -тий, and the periphery is formed by sentences with forms ending in -но and -тo and sentences with passive verbs ending in -ся. The respondents’ choice of two-part sentences with predicative passive participles is sometimes due to their structural and semantic differences from one-part sentences with forms ending in -но and -тo. However, the preference for two-part passive clauses over one-part passive clauses mostly depends on the preferences of speakers and represents the continuation of the tradition of using syntactic models common to Russian and Ukrainian, which is followed by most authors of scientific and educational literature, whose writing style is also imitated by philology students. In the language practice of philology students, one-part sentences with forms ending in -ho and -тo have not yet taken a nuclear position as a specific semantic and grammatical phenomenon of the Ukrainian language. At the same time, the very low percentage of respondents (up to 12 %) who chose these constructions with the subject of action suggests that they are aware of the non-normativity of the three-component construction with the forms ending in -нo and -тo. The peripherally of sentences with passive verbs ending in -ex in the choice of philology students demonstrates their focus on the current actualization of specific syntactic constructions of the Ukrainian literary language. We see the prospect of the study in the questionnaire survey of students of non-philology, which will make it possible to trace the trends in the functioning of active and passive constmctions in the modem usage of students in general and students of non-philology in particular, as well as to assess the process of restoring the identity of the Ukrainian book language through the use of syntactic constmctions that are organic to it.en_US
dc.description.abstractУ статті проаналізовано співвідношення активних і пасивних конструкцій в українсько- мовній практиці студентів-філологів. На основі проведеного анкетування визначено обсяг та ієрархію парадигми пасивних конструкцій. Окреслено тенденції у виборі того чи того типу пасивної конструкції. Оцінено рівень обізнаности студентів філологічних спеціальностей закладів вищої освіти України зі специфікою синтаксичних норм української літературної мови. uk_UA
dc.identifier.citationЛаврінець О. Я. Активні та пасивні конструкції в мовній практиці студентів-філологів закладів вищої освіти України / О. Я. Лаврінець // Українська мова. - 2024. - № 3 (91). - С. 58-75. - https://doi.org/10.15407/ukr mova2024.03.058 uk_UA
dc.identifier.issn1682-3540
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15407/ukr mova2024.03.058
dc.identifier.urihttps://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/32573
dc.language.isouk uk_UA
dc.relation.sourceУкраїнська мова uk_UA
dc.statusfirst published uk_UA
dc.subjectмовна практика (узус, мововжиток) uk_UA
dc.subjectанкета uk_UA
dc.subjectактивна конструкція uk_UA
dc.subjectпасивна конструкція uk_UA
dc.subjectпарадигма пасиву uk_UA
dc.subjectдієслова на -ся пасивного стану uk_UA
dc.subjectпредикативні дієприкметники на -ний, -тий uk_UA
dc.subjectформи на -но, -то uk_UA
dc.subjectстаття uk_UA
dc.subjectlanguage practice (usus, language use)en_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectactive constructionen_US
dc.subjectpassive constructionen_US
dc.subjectpassive paradigmen_US
dc.subjectpassive verbs on -сяen_US
dc.subjectpredicative participles on -ний, -тийen_US
dc.subjectforms on -нo, -тoen_US
dc.titleАктивні та пасивні конструкції в мовній практиці студентів-філологів закладів вищої освіти України uk_UA
dc.title.alternativeActive and passive constructions in the language practice of philology students of universities of Ukraineen_US
dc.typeArticle uk_UA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lavrinets_Aktyvni_ta_pasyvni_konstruktsii_v_movnii_praktytsi_studentiv-filolohiv_zakladiv_vyshchoi_osvity_Ukrainy.pdf
Size:
408.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Кафедра української мови