Punishing Communist Rights Abuses
| dc.contributor.author | Antonovych, Myroslava | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-11T11:57:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-11T11:57:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2000 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The problem of correlating law, politics, and justice inevitably arises in periods of political change. According to Ruti Teitel, a dilemma arises over the relationship between the rule of law and the problem of successor justice. To what extent does bringing the old regime to trial imply an inherent con ict between predecessor and successor visions of justice? In light of this con ict, is such criminal justice compatible with the rule of law? The dilemma raised by successor criminal justice leads to broader questions about the law’s role in the transformation to the liberal state. Many scholars claim that in transitional periods the rule-of-law principle takes precedence over the prior regime’s laws. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Antonovych M. Punishing Communist Rights Abuses / Myroslava Antonovych // Peace Review. - 2000. - Vol. 12, no. 1 (March). - С. 31-37. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/4264 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.source | Peace Review | en_US |
| dc.status | first published | en_US |
| dc.subject | law | en_US |
| dc.subject | politics | en_US |
| dc.subject | justice | en_US |
| dc.subject | rule of law | en_US |
| dc.subject | article | en_US |
| dc.title | Punishing Communist Rights Abuses | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |