Антонович, МирославаВіщик, Максим2022-07-282022-07-282022https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23501The general purpose of the present analysis is three-fold: (i) to comprehensively lay out the evolution of international adjudication and map out the modern adjudication architecture and the roots of the problem, (ii) to define the phenomena of jurisdictional parallelism and conflicts, and their key implications, and (iii) to study the options available to mitigate the risks resulting from the latter.eninternational adjudicationinternational arbitrationflourishing of international justiceyudicial propriety doctrineconflicting jurisdictions’ risksmaster thesisParallelismof jurisdictions of international courts, tribunals and quasi-judicial bodies and remedying jurisdictional conflictsПаралелізм юрисдикцій міжнародних судів, трибуналів і квазі-судових органів та врегулювання юрисдикційних конфліктівOther