Boscheinen-Duursma, HenrietteKhanyk-Pospolitak, Roksolana2020-09-042020-09-042019Boscheinen-Duursma H. C. Austrian and Ukrainian Comparative Study of E-Justice: Towards Confidence of Judicial Rights Protection / Boscheinen-Duursma H. C., Khanyk-Pospolitak R. // Access to justice in Eastern Europe. - 2019. - Issue 4. - P. 42-59.https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-2.4-a000022https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/17911The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of e-justice in Ukraine and Austria, in particular, the authors describe the current situation, strategy of e-justice development in Ukraine and Austria, as well as the potential risks, problems and benefits of introducing e-justice in Ukraine. The link between the goals and task of civil proceeding with e-justice was succinctly shown in this article. Also, the common elements of e-justice in Ukraine and Austria were highlighted, among them the following three elements were analysed in depth: an appeal to court with different documents, electronic evidence and consideration of the case in electronic form. Based on the comparative analysis, conclusions about what is common and different in e-justice in Ukraine and Austria and the value Ukraine should take from the experience of e-justice in Austria were drawn.ene-justiceSingle Judicial Systemelements of e-justiceelectronic legal communicationAustrian e-justice systemarticleAustrian and Ukrainian Comparative Study of E-Justice: Towards Confidence of Judicial Rights ProtectionArticle