У статті з’ясовано проблему контекстної логіко-інтелектуальної
експресивності та входження її до сфери категорії регулятивності.
Із цією метою експресивність проаналізовано у двох її виявах – інгерентному та адгерентному. Доведено, що адгерентні експресивні засоби – стилістичні прийоми – беруть активну участь у регулюванні читацької діяльності. Продемонстровано інклюзивні відношення між
експресемами та регулятемами, окреслено ядерно-периферійний ресурс регулятивних засобів.
Background. Nowadays the category of text expressiveness is equitably
evaluated due to modern linguistic disciplines’ foundation. The latter
qualifies language on the basis of a person, its generator. It was ascertained
the expressiveness integrates emotive-evaluative as well as logicalintellectual components. This fact caused the forthcoming thorough
research of inclusive relations between expressiveness and regulativeness –
another text category. Purpose. The disquisition aims in all-embracing analysis of the inherent
and adherent expressiveness dimensions. It brings to proof the adherent
expressemes are identical to regulatemes according to their formal
representation, functional features, and communicative potential.
Methods. The context-interpretation method opens up the further
perspective of the author’s conceptions reconstruction; the regulatory
structuring method and the regulatory means revealing methods in particular
disclose the simplest signals of contents marking.
Results. The regulatory means are modeled via image associations and
schemes usaging the whole spectrum of stylistic methods such as lingual
graphic-expressing tools. Peculiarities of regulatemes’ functioning have been
grounded on multichannel communication, attained by text “stylistic drawing”.
Inherent expressive means form the periphery of regulativeness; they interact
with adherent ones in the active way. Such the periphery can be also constituted
by denotates’ specificity markers, which are considered to be proper-nominative
units.
Discussion. The content aspect of expressiveness and regulativeness
reveals a great difference between them. Connotations are a nuclear of the
expressiveness, relaying colorful, emotional language. The regulatory
operation field covers the text content importance – lingual-speech product.
The process of identifying regulatory signals of artistic message is the key to
future deep analysis of their edifice specificity provided by regulatory means
in the regulatory structures.
