| dc.description.abstract |
The article aims at analyzing the nature and purpose of lustration as a process of power purification that
has taken place in post-communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe, as well as its connection with human
rights respect. As concluded, the lustration, being a political phenomenon, has the purpose to provide
post authoritarian states with their transition from cruelty and repression towards democracy. Furthermore,
this process has both punitive and preventive nature: on the one hand, it aims at punishing for the offence of
the previous repressive regime; on the other hand, it prevents new democracies from individuals who may
threaten them because of their past. In this case, lustration allows vetting and banning such persons from being
public officials for several periods. This process is an instrument of democracy defending itself, including
political loyalty of public officials.
Although lustration is a necessary and integral component of transitional justice, it has to be implemented
with respect of human rights and the rule of law. International legal documents, such as Resolution 1096
(1996) adopted by the Council of Europe`s Parliamentary Assembly, do not prohibit or judge lustration. However,
this process must be due and fair regarding human rights. Otherwise, the European Court of Human
Rights considers lustration measures as the violation of rights guaranteed by the European Convention of Human
Rights. According to its relevant judgments, ECHR often points out to the abuse of discretion by States,
the disproportion and excessive severity of lustration measures. In conclusion, lustration should be implemented
in balancing between democracy defending itself and protecting human rights. |
en_US |